Two data domains
Court rules
Individual judge rules, standing orders, and filing requirements for 20+ courts and 630+ judges. Three rule layers: FRCP, Local Rules, Standing Orders. Every rule traced to its source PDF with page and section numbers. Given a document’s metadata and filing context, the API checks compliance against all three layers and returns pass/fail results citing the specific rule. Try the quickstartEnforcement intelligence
Privacy enforcement actions from 21 jurisdictions: FTC, HHS, and 19 state attorneys general. Each event includes entity, fine amount, violation types, laws cited, remedies, and contract search terms. Every event links to the official government source. Search by jurisdiction, date, industry, risk level, or violation type. Available through MCP and the console. Browse the data modelCourt Rules Quickstart
Run a compliance check in under a minute.
Enforcement Data
Search 1,100+ enforcement actions across 21 jurisdictions.
MCP: Court Rules
Filing compliance tools via Model Context Protocol.
MCP: Enforcement
Enforcement data tools via Model Context Protocol.
API Reference
Full endpoint documentation.
Coverage
| Domain | Scope |
|---|---|
| Federal courts | 20 districts profiled, 630+ judges tracked |
| State courts (beta) | 6 jurisdictions, 376 judges |
| Enforcement | 21 jurisdictions, 1,100+ events, $8.8B+ in fines |
Data freshness
| Data type | Update frequency |
|---|---|
| Enforcement events | Within 24 hours of the official government announcement |
| FTC actions | Within 4 hours (RSS feed) |
| State AG actions | Within 24 hours (press release pages checked daily) |
| HHS breach reports | Within 24 hours (breach portal checked daily) |
| Court rules | Re-extracted when a judge updates their standing order or practices |
| API and MCP uptime | 99.9% target |
What’s next
Pick your path based on what you’re building:- Filing compliance for litigation software: Start with the Quickstart, then explore Integration Patterns
- Enforcement monitoring for in-house legal platforms: Start with MCP: Enforcement Data, then browse Enforcement Data
- AI agent integration: See Building with AI Agents
- Evaluating the platform? See how the same brief gets different results depending on the judge